SAST Vs. DAST

With the increasing complexity of web applications and the rise in sophisticated cyber threats, implementing a robust security testing strategy is essential for protecting sensitive data and maintaining trust.

Two primary methods for identifying vulnerabilities in applications are Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). While both approaches aim to detect and mitigate security flaws, each has unique strengths and limitations. In this guide, we'll explore the differences between SAST and DAST, helping you choose the best approach to safeguard your web applications.

What is SAST?

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a white-box testing approach that analyzes an application's source code, bytecode, or binary code without actually running the application. This method focuses on examining the internal structure of the code to detect vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle. SAST is widely valued for helping developers identify and fix potential security risks before they make it into production, thus reducing the likelihood of costly vulnerabilities down the line.

Key Features of SAST

• SAST can identify vulnerabilities while code is being developed, allowing developers to address issues before release.
• Since SAST works directly with source code, it excels at finding flaws like insecure coding practices, injection vulnerabilities, and access control weaknesses.
• SAST tools can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines, facilitating continuous code scanning to maintain security in agile development.
• Many compliance frameworks, such as PCI-DSS and ISO 27001, require code analysis. SAST provides extensive insights into code quality, helping meet these standards.

When to use SAST?

SAST is most effective when used in the early stages of development as part of a "shift-left" security strategy, which emphasizes embedding security earlier in the development lifecycle. This approach reduces the time and cost of fixing vulnerabilities by catching them before they reach production.

What is DAST?

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) is a black-box testing approach that evaluates the security of an application in a running environment. Unlike SAST, DAST does not require access to the source code; instead, it simulates real-world attack scenarios to identify vulnerabilities in a live, operational application. This approach is ideal for finding issues related to runtime behavior, such as authentication, session management, and API misconfigurations.

Key Features of DAST

• DAST assesses applications in a live environment, enabling it to detect runtime vulnerabilities like authentication issues and logic flaws.
• DAST doesn't require access to source code, making it suitable for testing third-party applications or legacy systems.
• DAST simulates user interactions to reveal session management weaknesses, input validation flaws, and access control issues.
• DAST can test various application types, including web apps, microservices, and API-driven architectures, providing flexibility.

When to use DAST

DAST is particularly useful in testing and production environments, where applications are live and fully operational. It’s highly effective for finding security gaps that only appear when the application is deployed and interacting with end users.

Comparing SAST and DAST: Which is right for you?

Factor	SAST	DAST
Testing Stage	Early (during development)	Later (in staging or production)
Type of Access	Requires source or binary code access	No code access required
Detection	Static vulnerabilities (e.g., code flaws)	Runtime vulnerabilities (e.g., logic flaws)
Integration	CI/CD, DevSecOps, IDEs	Can run alongside production and testing
Compliance Support	Supports compliance (PCI-DSS, ISO)	Suitable for pen-testing requirements
Primary Use Case	Code quality and early flaw detection	Behavioral analysis and runtime testing

Combining Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) creates a robust, holistic security approach. This combination covers both code vulnerabilities and runtime issues, providing broader protection. SAST and DAST together allow organizations to "shift left" by identifying security flaws early in development and "shift right" by monitoring applications continuously in production. This dual approach improves security by capturing coding errors and behavioral flaws that only appear in a live environment.

This combined strategy supports compliance standards and fosters long-term resilience, making it ideal for companies implementing DevSecOps practices to integrate security at every stage of the development lifecycle. With tools like Trixus for real-time testing and reporting, organizations can ensure robust coverage and compliance across their applications.

Why Krya Solutions

Choosing the right security partner is not about running tools — it is about understanding how real attackers think and how real systems fail in production. Krya Solutions focuses on practical, impact-driven application security, not checklist-based scanning.

Unlike generic security vendors, Krya Solutions approaches SAST and DAST from an attacker's path and developer's reality, ensuring findings are relevant, exploitable, and actionable.

What Sets Krya Solutions Apart

1. Risk-Based, Not Tool-Based Security
   Most vendors rely heavily on automated tools that generate high volumes of findings with little context. Krya Solutions prioritizes business impact, exploitability, and real-world risk. Every finding is validated and mapped to how it could be abused in a real attack scenario.
2. Security Aligned With Development Reality
   Krya works closely with engineering teams, not just security teams. Findings are explained with:
          Clear vulnerable code paths
          Root cause analysis
          Developer-friendly remediation guidance
   This ensures fixes are practical and do not disrupt delivery timelines.
3. Real-World Attacker Mindset
   Our methodology is inspired by real breach patterns, red team tactics, and production incidents — not just OWASP lists. This allows us to uncover issues that automated tools and basic scans often miss.

How Krya Solutions Delivers SAST and DAST Differently

• SAST and DAST are executed together, not as independent scans
• Findings are correlated between source code and live application behavior
• Only exploitable or realistically reachable issues are reported

SAST

• Review focuses on authentication, authorization, and data handling logic
• Code paths are traced to understand how an attacker can reach them
• False positives from tools are removed manually
• Fix guidance is mapped directly to affected functions or components

DAST

• Testing follows real attacker workflows, not automated crawling paths
• Business logic and role abuse are explicitly tested
• APIs and web flows are tested together, not in isolation
• Vulnerabilities are validated in runtime before reporting
• Reports prioritize impact over count
• No generic scanner output is shared with clients